Peer Review policy

All submitted manuscripts undergo external double-blind peer review.

1. Review Procedure

Each article is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
The identities of both authors and reviewers are kept anonymous during the review process.

2. Independence of Reviewers

To ensure objectivity and independence:

• Reviewers must not be affiliated with the same institution as the author(s).
• The Editorial Board checks reviewers’ affiliations and possible conflicts of interest before assignment.
• If such a conflict is detected, another reviewer is appointed.

3. Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers assess:

• originality and scientific contribution,
• methodological soundness,
• relevance to the journal’s scope,
• clarity and structure of the text.

4. Decision Process

Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the Editorial Board decides whether to:

• accept the manuscript,
• request revisions, or
• reject it.
  The author is informed of the final decision via e-mail.

5. Confidentiality

All manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers are prohibited from using any unpublished material for personal advantage.